Edit Film critic Owen Gleiberman has observed that Lumet was a "hardboiled straight-shooter," who, because he was trained during the golden Age of television in the s, became noted for his energetic style of directing.
In contrast to these jerks, you have men like Juror 8, 9, and 11, all of whom believe in justice and the goodness of people. Props We learn a lot about Juror 7 because of the baseball tickets in his box: In contract, Juror 8 cares about a knife he bought for six dollars because this knife totally undermines the argument that the murder weapon in the trial was completely unique.
One of the reasons the movie relies so much on props like these is that it was first written as a television play. We later learn that family life also plays a huge role in the opinions of Juror 3, the main antagonist in the movie. As 3 mentions, he was physically hard on his own son until one day, his son slugged him in the face and disappeared from his life.
Location One of the big issues surrounding the kid on trial is the fact that he comes from some lower-class slums. Some of the jurors think that this is reason enough to convict him, since they believe that everyone who comes out of a slum is a future thief or murderer.
But Juror 5 shuts them up when he reveals that he lived in a slum his whole life, and he turned out just fine. These kinds of arguments show that the jurors in addition to being racially biased can also be geographically biased, thinking that some people are worse than others because of the neighborhoods they come from.
Names Names are significant in this movie, even though or precisely because of the fact that none are ever mentioned. The only two names we ever hear come in the very last scene of the movie, when Jurors 8 and 9 meet outside the courthouse and introduce themselves as Davis and McCardle.
Big principles like justice and democracy are too important to pin on any one person, so Reginald Rose the screenwriter makes the clever choice of never offering any names at all—perhaps with the hope that his audience will reflect a bit more on the bigger picture and not just on the individual characters.Sidney Lumet Essay Examples.
An Overview of the Characterization Concept in the Movie 12 Angry Men Directed by Sidney Lumet. Marlon Brando is widely considered the greatest an overview of the characterization in the movie 12 angry men directed by sidney arthur lumet movie actor of all time, rivaled only by the more theatrically oriented Laurence Olivier in terms of.
Marlon Brando is widely considered the greatest movie actor of all time, rivaled only by the more theatrically oriented Laurence Olivier in terms of. A consummate workaholic who helmed vibrant films well into his eighties, Sidney Lumet laid claim to being one of the most revered and most imitated directors of all time.
Films like "Twelve Angry Men" (), "Dog Day Afternoon" (), "Network" () and "The Verdict" () were more than just classics – they became cultural fixtures that.
An Overview of the Characterization in the Movie 12 Angry Men Directed by Sidney Arthur Lumet PAGES 6. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: 12 angry men, sidney arthur lumet, lack of special effects, use of characterization.
Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin. 12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, "12 Citizens", follows the plot of the original American movie, while including characters reflecting contemporary Beijing society, including a cab.