Indian industrial policy after 1991

The standard was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards with the following objectives - To assess the quality of water resources, and To check the effectiveness of water treatment and supply by the concerned authorities. They also apply to water supplied by Non Government or Private Agencies for human consumption in any place of the country. The various parameters covered include color, odour, pH, total dissolved solids, hardness, alkalinity, elemental compounds such as iron, manganese, sulphate, nitrate, chloride, fluoride, arsenic, chromium, copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, zinc and coliform bacteria.

Indian industrial policy after 1991

The spice trade between India and Europe was the main catalyst for the Age of Discovery. The inscription shown, is a Sanskrit invocation of Lord Shiva. The combination of protectionistimport-substitutionFabian socialismand social democratic -inspired policies governed India for sometime after the end of British rule.

The economy was then characterised by extensive regulation, protectionismpublic ownership of large monopolies, pervasive corruption and slow growth. Evidence of well-planned streets, a drainage system and water supply reveals their knowledge of urban planningwhich included the first-known urban sanitation systems and the existence of a form of municipal government.

Both the Malabar and Coromandel Coasts were the sites of important trading centres from as early as the first century BC, used for import and export as well as transit points between the Mediterranean region and southeast Asia.

Historians Tapan Raychaudhuri and Irfan Habib claim this state patronage for overseas trade came to an end by the thirteenth century AD, when it was largely taken over by the local Parsi, Jewish, Syrian Christian and Muslim communities, initially on the Malabar and subsequently on the Coromandel coast.

These traders built a Hindu templewhich suggests commerce was active and prosperous for Indians by the 17th century. Villages paid a portion of their agricultural produce as revenue to the rulers, while their craftsmen received a part of the crops at harvest time for their services.

Silver coin of the Gupta dynasty5th century AD. Mughal era — See also: Muslin trade in Bengal and Economy of the Kingdom of Mysore The Indian economy was large and prosperous under the Mughal Empireup until the 18th century. The Mughal economy functioned on an elaborate system of coined currency, land revenue and trade.

Gold, silver and copper coins were issued by the royal mints which functioned on the basis of free coinage.

Indian industrial policy after 1991

Key industries included textilesshipbuildingand steeland processed exports included cotton textiles, yarnsthreadsilkjute products, metalwareand foods such as sugaroils and butter. This marked a determinative shift in India's trade, and a less-powerful impact on the rest of the economy.

As the painstaking statistical work of the Cambridge historian Angus Maddison has shown, India's share of world income collapsed from Indeed, at the beginning of the 20th century, "the brightest jewel in the British Crown" was the poorest country in the world in terms of per capita income.

From the beginning of the 19th century, the British East India Company 's gradual expansion and consolidation of power brought a major change in taxation and agricultural policies, which tended to promote commercialisation of agriculture with a focus on trade, resulting in decreased production of food crops, mass impoverishment and destitution of farmers, and in the short term, led to numerous famines.

The British East India Company, following their conquest of Bengal inhad forced open the large Indian market to British goods, which could be sold in India without tariffs or dutiescompared to local Indian producers who were heavily taxedwhile in Britain protectionist policies such as bans and high tariffs were implemented to restrict Indian textiles from being sold there, whereas raw cotton was imported from India without tariffs to British factories which manufactured textiles from Indian cotton and sold them back to the Indian market.

British economic policies gave them a monopoly over India's large market and cotton resources. It also established a system of railways and telegraphs, a civil service that aimed to be free from political interference, a common-law and an adversarial legal system.

However, at the end of colonial rule, India inherited an economy that was one of the poorest in the developing world, [] with industrial development stalled, agriculture unable to feed a rapidly growing population, a largely illiterate and unskilled labour force, and extremely inadequate infrastructure.

Search form

Subsequently, the policy of discriminating protection where certain important industries were given financial protection by the statecoupled with the Second World War, saw the development and dispersal of industries, encouraging rural—urban migration, and in particular the large port cities of BombayCalcutta and Madras grew rapidly.

Despite this, only one-sixth of India's population lived in cities by Leaders of the Indian independence movement and economic historians have blamed colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy in its aftermath and argued that financial strength required for industrial development in Britain was derived from the wealth taken from India.

At the same time, right-wing historians have countered that India's low economic performance was due to various sectors being in a state of growth and decline due to changes brought in by colonialism and a world that was moving towards industrialisation and economic integration.

Indian industrial policy after 1991

Economic historian Prasannan Parthasarathi presented earnings data which showed real wages and living standards in 18th century Bengal and Mysore being higher than in Britain, which in turn had the highest living standards in Europe.

Licence Raj Indian economic policy after independence was influenced by the colonial experience, which was seen as exploitative by Indian leaders exposed to British social democracy and the planned economy of the Soviet Union.

Steel, mining, machine tools, telecommunications, insurance, and power plants, among other industries, were effectively nationalised in the mids. Figures are inflation-adjusted to International Geary-Khamis dollars. Tata, when Tata suggested state-owned companies should be profitable [] Jawaharlal Nehruthe first prime minister of Indiaalong with the statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobisformulated and oversaw economic policy during the initial years of the country's independence.

They expected favourable outcomes from their strategy, involving the rapid development of heavy industry by both public and private sectorsand based on direct and indirect state intervention, rather than the more extreme Soviet-style central command system.

I even need the government's permission for the salary I pay to a senior executive. Tataon the Indian regulatory system, [] Sincethe use of high-yielding varieties of seedsincreased fertilisers and improved irrigation facilities collectively contributed to the Green Revolution in Indiawhich improved the condition of agriculture by increasing crop productivity, improving crop patterns and strengthening forward and backward linkages between agriculture and industry.India: Industrial Policy, Liberalization and Impact.

Instruments used by Industrial Policy. India after Independence deliberately opted to promote Heavy Capital Industry which was to be under state control.

This was implemented through five year plans. New Industrial Policy, New Economic Policy of Objectives, Features and Impacts.

Hemant Singh FEB New Economic Policy of India Industrial explosives (v) Drugs. Economic Reforms in India since Category: Economy of India On August 21, By Amit Sen. To liberalize the industrial policy of the government and to invite foreign investment by privatization of industries and abolishing the license system as .

The quest for industrial development started soon after independence in The Industrial Policy Resolution of defined the broad contours of the policy delineating the role of the State in industrial development both as an entrepreneur and authority.

The strategy of reforms introduced in India in July presented a mixture of macroeconomic stabilization and structural adjustment. It was guided by short-term and long-term objectives. Economic Reforms. The government announced a New Industrial Policy on 24 July The New Industrial Policy established in .

The question of who's really an American Indian, what with the variation in blood quantum requirements from tribe to tribe, is confusing enough, and it's mostly because the Federal government has a long history of meddling, claiming the right to tell Indian people who they are and who they ought to be.

Carlisle Indian Industrial School - Wikipedia